Saturday, February 5, 2011

WHY I’M NOT A REPUBLICAN

I consider myself a loyal American and think I’m middle of the road politically. I have never missed voting in an election, and I think we should have universal military service. I believe in public schools and the right to bear arms. I keep guns at home. If someone tried to harm my family, I would not hesitate to punch their ticket. I support the local police and believe in national defense.

But I could never be a Republican. Here’s why: misdirected wars, ignorance of the environment, tax policies in favor of the rich, fake morality, lying for political gain, violent hatred, threats to use force to gain political power, and false-front organizations.

Let me give some details:

1. Iraq. Under the Republican leadership of President George W. Bush, we invaded a foreign nation that was ruled by a vicious dictator (that we had previously supported), but that didn't threaten us and had no capability of harming us. More than 100,000 Iraqi civilians have died. Millions more have been displaced. Iraq had no connection to the attacks of 9/11. Our invasion made no strategic sense and has produced nothing of long-term value for the USA. We have lost 4,000 brave Americans in this war.

Apparently the current regime in Iraq does not have a sterling human rights record. I heard on the radio the other day an interview with an Iraqi man who said, “It’s just like Saddam, all over again.”

We spent billions of dollars and spilled our blood for this?

When we invaded Iraq, I marched against the war, but I told my liberal friends, “The war may be wrong, but at least a lot of good, intelligent Americans are going over there to do the right thing.” Now I’m not so sure. I think it was a colossal mistake.

2. Guatemala. President Ronald Reagan’s policies resulted in the deaths of 200,000 innocent people. It was an hysterical anti-communist scare that had no basis in reality. I doubt if those peons in the mountains of Central American even knew what a communist was, or if they had even heard of Karl Marx.

3. Vietnam. Unfortunately, I can’t blame this misdirected war all on the GOP. President Kennedy took part in the wanton killing of innocent rice farmers. But no one was as guilty as Nixon, and my GOP friend still supports the war. Three million Vietnamese and fifty thousand Americans died, because of anti-communist fear and hysteria. Remember, we had to burn the villages to save them. Ridiculous.

4. When Sarah Palin was governor of Alaska, before she resigned in mid-term, she sent a letter to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger of California arguing against a policy that would have saved about 2,000 lives a year in Southern California. It would have required the cleanup of diesel emissions near Long Beach and Los Angeles Harbors. To her, profits were more important than people. Cough-cough. I can’t see Sarah for the smog. This is a pro-death policy, not a pro-life policy.

5. Political economy. In the USA, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Over the past 50 years, our income has migrated up the economic ladder. Pretty soon, we’ll be like a Latin American country, where 10% of the people hold onto 90% of the wealth. Apparently, that is what Republicans want. Tax policies, mostly supported by the GOP, continue to push us in that direction. This country was built on a strong middle class, and we should strengthen it, not undercut it.

6. Lies, distortions, and fake morality. A short list:

a. Republican George W. Bush lied to defeat Democrat Ann Richards for the governorship of Texas. This lie was concocted by Karl Rove. They took out ads saying that juvenile crime was up in Texas and Richards wasn’t doing anything about it. In fact, juvenile crime was down. The young Bush started his meteoric rise in politics with a big fat lie.

b. Bush lied about yellowcake Uranium from Niger. He lied about Saddam Hussein plotting to attack the USA. His secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, lied when she said we might see a mushroom cloud over the White House.

c. Newt Gingrich was having an affair while his wife was in the hospital. At the same time, he was criticizing President Bill Clinton for his lack of morals. Isn’t that living a lie? It certainly is fake morality.

d. The so-called “Ground-Zero Mosque” that Gingrich and other right wingers raged on about was not a mosque at all, and was not planned for Ground Zero. It would be a 13-story community center that would be open to the public, with a concert hall, a gymnasium, a child-care facility, a library, a culinary school and restaurant, and a prayer room. It was planned to take the place of an old Burlington Coat factory two blocks from Ground Zero. But you can’t get ignorant people fired up with the truth. A community center on the site of an old coat factory? Oh my God!

e. So-called “death panels” didn’t exist, were not proposed and won’t exist. They were a Sarah Palin special: bull crap on toast.

f. The so-called pro-lifers have a twisted sense of morality when it comes to abortion. Conservative commentator Bill O’Reilly on Fox News called Dr. George Tiller, a physician in Wichita, KS, “Tiller the killer” because the doctor performed late-term abortions. But Tiller saved hundreds of women’s lives, and he would only do the procedure if the woman’s life was in danger and if the baby was already brain-dead inside them or otherwise not viable. Then a nut-job murdered Tiller, believing he was doing the right thing.

7. The violent hatred. I have a right-wing friend, who shall remain nameless, who called President Obama both a Nazi and a Marxist. Of course, that makes no sense. Hitler rose to power in 1930s Germany by fomenting anti-communist hysteria and blaming Jews for the country’s extreme economic problems. Henry Ford and other big American businessmen supported Hitler because they feared communism. Ford built the tanks that Hitler used to invade Poland. But American right wingers now despise Obama and call him Hitler. You can’t have it both ways. You can’t be both a Nazi and a communist.

8. Threats to use guns to gain power. Some extreme right wingers now say they are going to use “Second-Amendment remedies” to bring down Congress and the President. Sounds like Latin America or Nazi Germany. And these people call themselves good Americans? Unbelievable. Mainstream GOP leaders have not repudiated them, as they should.

9. Neglect of the environment. A right-wing friend said to me one time, “Maybe God put us on Earth to destroy it.” Hmmm, OK. Then we’ve been doing a good job. If you hate the outdoors, and nature, and forests, and clean lakes and rivers with fish in them, and green trees, and wildlife, then you’re a good Republican.

10. Many right-wing organizations, like “Americans For Prosperity,” are fronts for big business. AFP is a political front for the billionaires Charles and David Koch, owners of Koch Industries, a $100-billion-a-year oil conglomerate with HQ in Wichita, KA. The Koch brothers have paid AFP spokesmen who say such things as, “Liberals are like red ants at a picnic, you just have to squash them.” Do these people sound like good Americans? Why hide in the shadows if they aren’t doing anything wrong? What are they ashamed of? Is violence good for American politics?

The Grand Old Party’s principles seem to be that you have to kill for peace, that pollution is OK, long live the rich, tell any lie to win, hate the Democrats for they are the enemy within, it’s OK to use guns to gain power, and it’s OK to conduct political business in the shadows.

Are these your values? They are not mine.

I could never be a Republican. The truth is important to me. Civilization is important. The right to dissent is important. Free speech is important. The strength of the USA is important. “United we stand, divided we fall,” as someone once said. The right-wingers and tea partiers are trying to divide the country, not unite it. They don’t have the nation’s best interests at heart, and they don’t understand the consequences of their ideology. They are so sure they are right, they will kill the rest of us to prove it.

Copyright 2011, Roger R. Angle

Friday, February 4, 2011

YES, BUT IS IT ART?

I am sad to report that the art world -- you know, people who make and show and buy fine art, mostly painting and sculpture -- today has been infiltrated or even dominated by work that is lame, juvenile and pointless.

Much of it shows no little or no talent and no respect for traditions, materials or the audience.

The other night (Thursday, Feb. 3, 2011), I went to the Hammer Museum in Los Angeles, just south of UCLA, to see a presentation by "one of the most highly regarded painters working today," Laura Owens. She showed a series of photos of her work, installed in galleries in New York, Chicago, and I think Europe.

I was appalled. I tried to like them, and I tried to think they were examples of fine art, but, alas, I could not.

Ms. Owens may be a very nice person and she may mean well, but many of her paintings looked like crude illustrations for children's books. The decorative elements were often dull squiggles and pointless shapes, bland areas of thick paint with little or no craftsmanship, and large areas of blank canvas.

One painting was designed to fit into a corner of a gallery and fool the viewer into thinking it was part of the wall, with little hints of art work at the top and bottom. Oh goody, a painting that is deliberately pointless.

The works showed only a crude sense of design, no sense of composition, and no content.

I wasn't sure I had seen enough, so later I went online and looked at dozens of other works. None of them were any better. All were disappointing.

What I want, when I go to a gallery or museum to see contemporary art, is a sense of excitement, the shock of the new, a sense of insight, of possibility, of visual renewal, the power of an intelligent sensibility brought to bear on people and places and things.

I want to be impressed. I want to think, Wow, I've never seen anything like this before. I want to see the world in a new way. I want to think, Gee, I never thought of that. I want to come out of an exhibit more aware and enlightened and sensitized than I was when I went in.

Good luck, on this night.

So, when I had enough of this slide show, I got up and went downstairs in the museum.

There was a gallery on the first floor, about 30 x 30 ft., with only two objects in it. In the center stood a large fan next to a snare drum. The fan was blowing air across the drum.

Sound boring and pointless? It was.
But wait.

From the ceiling, directly over the drum, every few seconds a drop of water would fall. But the drop of water would miss the drum. The fan would blow it away. The floor next to the drum was wet. So the drops of water were falling toward the drum but splashing onto the floor instead.

Enlightening? Exciting? A work of art? You tell me.   

Art is about vision and sensibility and intelligence. This "piece" had nothing like that. What a waste of time. What an insult to the viewer.

Significant parts of the art world seem to be in about as bad a shape as the publishing world. I don't know which is worse.

Art supposedly foreshadows the future of a civilization.
What do you think our future looks like?
Crude illustrations passed off as fine art?
Fans blowing drops of water? Drums that don't sound?

Oh, baby. I hope this doesn't mean what I think it means.


Copyright 2011, Roger R. Angle. 

EGYPT NOW

I don't know much about Egypt. Many years ago, I dated a Greek girl who had been raised in Egypt. She was beautiful. Her name was Marie. Hubba hubba.

But as I read and hear news reports, mostly from NPR and the NY Times, my favorite news sources, I get the feeling that those are my brothers and sisters over there who are protesting. 

I say right on! Power to the people! Sounds like they are long overdue for a peaceful revolution.

I hope they get democracy and a functioning government.

But I have this warning: It is not going to be easy, and it is not going to be perfect.

Look at us here in the good old USA. Sometimes, democracy is a mess. Sometimes, it is threatened by well meaning people who are misguided. Sometimes, freedoms are misused.

But it beats the hell out of tyranny and torture.

Good fortune to you all, my Egyptian brothers and sisters.

Copyright 2011 by Roger R. Angle.


WHY JAMES JOYCE?

A friend of mine left a comment here asking why James Joyce is considered a great writer. I sent her some e-mails, and I'm going to adapt my response here.

You don't see why James Joyce is great? Lordy. Have you read any of his work? Start reading "Ulysses" aloud and see what happens. Or start "Portrait Of The Artist As A Young Man."

If reading him aloud doesn't do it, call me, and we can read a few lines together. His writing is the richest, most powerful, and most full of associations, meaning and allusions of any writer save Faulkner and Shakespeare.

You can read "Ulysses" horizontally, for the story, and you can also read it vertically, meaning you can follow each allusion and association as you read. You can spend hours reading almost any page in "Ulysses."

In short, there's more going on in Joyce than anyone else. James Joyce is the only writer I know, probably the only novelist in English, who completely mastered the craft of fiction. Hemingway said you can never master it. You are always learning and always trying to do more than you can accomplish.
 
But Joyce did master the craft, and he did it all. He wrote masterful realistic short fiction, "The Dubliners." Then a masterful more or less conventional novel, "Portrait Of The Artist As A Young Man." Then the biggest, grandest and deepest modern art novel, "Ulysses." The Grand Canyon of art novels. Then the most ambitious and successful avant garde novel ever written, "Finnegan's Wake."
 
In the last two, every phrase and every sentence has more than one meaning. For example, the phrase "Finnegan's Wake" means a gathering to mourn the death of a man named Finnegan. 
 
But it also means the wake a man leaves behind him, like the waves and ripples behind a boat as it moves through the water. A man moves through a sea of friends and relatives and other people and affects them all.
 
So in a way, the title announces the theme, and it's the ultimate theme for a novel: all the results and effects of a man's life.
 
James Joyce taught other writers more than any other modern novelist in English. He was a huge influence on Faulkner, arguably the greatest American novelist.
 
The way to read Joyce is to start at the beginning and read the books in chronological order, as far as you can. I got as far as the beginning of "Finnegan's Wake."
 
I recommend also, "Stephen Hero," an early draft of "Portrait Of The Artist...." You can see how he learned to write, and how much he grew as a writer.
 
I don't think there's any doubt that James Joyce is the greatest writer in the English language since Shakespeare.
He has it all: depth of theme, dazzling technique, richness of imagery, mastery of the elements of fiction, stunning originality.
 
All the rest of us may try to follow in his footsteps, but they are those of a giant.
 
Copyright 2011, Roger R. Angle.

Thursday, February 3, 2011

LIFESTYLES OF THE RICH & FAMOUS

Why do we go to such great lengths to protect the lifestyles of the rich?

And why do the right wingers poop their pants when you suggest that the rich should give something back to the society that made them rich?

Examples of wealthy lifestyles:

I heard about one family who decided to buy a second private jet, and presumably hire a second crew, so their teenagers would stop asking to borrow the family jet. (Gee, that sounds like a good idea. Think I'll do that.)  

One famous corporate dynamo, when he was head of a major entertainment company, reportedly met a woman he liked, and she lived in Japan. So he sent her a Boeing 747 filled with roses. (I don't know if she was sufficiently impressed or not. And I don't how much that cost, but I hope he got what he wanted.)

A reporter asked John McCain, when he was running for president, how many houses he and his wife Cindy, a beer baroness, owned. He said, "I'll get back to you on that." He didn't even know. Turned out they owned seven. (Well, I know how many houses I own: zero.)

The point: I think it's a great idea that children are going hungry and schools are failing so we can maintain those lifestyles. Don't you?

Copyright 2011, Roger R. Angle. 

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

JAMES JOYCE'S BIRTHDAY

Let us all sing a rousing chorus of Happy Birthday to you, to James Joyce, born Feb. 2, 1882.

He was probably the greatest writer in the English language in the 20th Century. Perhaps the greatest since Shakespeare.

Here's a toast to James Joyce: Let all of us strive to be as great in our fields of endeavor as you were in yours.

You showed us the way, I just hope we can follow.

Copyright 2011, Roger R. Angle. 

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

BAD WRITING, GOOD MONEY

Today I'm debating with myself about good writing and bad writing, and about the state of book publishing, specifically mystery and crime novels.

I'm reading "A World The Color of Salt," a crime novel by a friend who is truly a great writer, Noreen Ayres. She has published three novels but as far as I can tell has not made a million dollars.

I love her writing. She is literate, sensitive to the language, and creative. There is a lot of poetry in her prose.

On the other hand, look at the big bestsellers. Take, for example, Tana French. I tried to read one of Tana French's books, “Faithful Place,” and I found it to be boring, trivial, diffuse, and unengaging. The first ten pages had exactly one interesting line.

Look at all the bestsellers: James Patterson, John Grisham, Lisa Gardner, and even the so-called literary writers, like Jonathan Franzen. Their writing is less than admirable, I would say, to be kind.

Why does weak writing make more money? Is it that the book-buying public is illiterate and poorly educated? Maybe.

Whatever reason, the fact that great writers languish while crappy writers make millions is an example of Unbearable Crap.  

One novel by a famous mystery writer was so illogical that it gave me a headache. Now that same writer has published more than a dozen novels to world-wide acclaim.

To me, everything about Noreen Ayres's book is better: the story, the setting, the characters, the underlying logic, and of course the writing.

I give you two quotes by the poet Ezra Pound:

"A man reading ought to be a man intensely alive. The book ought to be a ball of light in his hands."

"The public will buy a certain amount of poetry if you give them their striptease.”

And, from Ernest Hemingway, mocking Ezra Pound:

“In the end, the age was handed / the sort of shit that it demanded.”
(Pardon my French. But I assume you speak French.)

It breaks my heart.

And there is this, from the most famous mystery writer, Raymond Chandler:

“As I look back on my own stories it would be absurd if I did not wish they had been better. But if they had been much better they would not have been published.”

I don't know if that is true.
I hope it isn't, but I fear that it is.

And one last truth:

“There's many a bestseller that could have been prevented by a good teacher.” -- Flannery O'Connor (1925-1964)

Amen to that.

Copyright 2011 by Roger R. Angle.